Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

As Oil Gushes in Gulf, BP Plans to Drill in Canada's Arctic Ocean

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Kari Birdseye:

if (window!= top) // if your website window is not top top.location.href=location.href Earthjustice received some superb video today from Dut...

by Jessica Ennis:
Arctic Needs Independent Review Of Drilling

Today, the Department of the Interior announced a 60-day assessment of the 2012 drilling program in the Arctic Ocean. Earthjustice legislative repres...

by Trip Van Noppen:
Shell's Drill Rigs Requiring Extra Federal Attention

With one Arctic drill rig shipwrecked on an Alaskan island and the other reportedly under criminal investigation for possibly “operating with se...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Terry Winckler's blog posts
05 May 2010, 8:46 AM
Prime minister makes assurances, but so did BP before blowout
Area in red shows Canada's Beaufort Sea

Canada's prime minister made a big show this week of insisting his nation—which like the U.S. is allowing offshore oil drilling in the Beafort Sea this summer—would not "tolerate" such massive oil spills as the one now unleashing in the Gulf of Mexico.

How PM Stephen Harper can make such a guarantee is rather interesting, especially when one considers that Canada granted its drilling leases in the Beaufort to British Petroleum, the company responsible for the Gulf oil spill. He assures that drilling won't proceed "unless the environment is protected."

If Harper sticks to his statement, oil drilling in the Beaufort can't proceed, because there is no way to protect the fragile, ice-laden Arctic seas from oil spills—no matter how insistent he is that preventive measures will first be put in place.

Keep in mind, as the Gulf tragedy unfolds on a historic scale, that BP had assured the U.S. government that any chance of an oil spill in the Gulf was "insignificant" and could easily be handled with its state-of-the-art, 'fail-safe' prevention devices. It's the same line Shell Oil used in convincing the Minerals Management Service to grant its permit for drilling in Arctic offshore waters.

It might be helpful for PM Harper, and for that matter President Obama, to read why Earthjustice is so strongly opposed to drilling in the Arctic. It's all about protecting one of the world's most remarkable places, and the creatures and human communities whose lives depend on it.

That faint rumbling sound you hear in the distance is Theodore Roosevelt doing somersaults in his grave.

But for something called an "acoustic regulator" this catastrophe might very well have been avoided. That device was deemed too expensive by BIG OIL and the Bush/Cheney administration allowed it to be discarded.

The price? A half a million dollars.

Andy Hardy: Dad, can I talk to you, man-to-man?

Judge Hardy: What is it, son?

Andy Hardy: I'm starting to think that deregulation wasn't a very good idea.

Judge Hardy: No s**t, Sherlock!

Some are calling this "Obama's Katrina". They're wrong. As a matter of fact it's not even close. This disaster is owned by George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney. Make no mistake about it.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.