Library Search

A major victory for communities living near coal ash plants, the rule closes a loophole that left over half of coal ash exempt from federal clean-up requirements.

“People should care about what’s going on here because all of us benefit from the goods movement system — no matter where you live.”

The so-called “Inflexible” gas regulation creates a fiction to lower the price of LNG.

A 15-year legal fight to curb toxic wastewater to protect drinking water.

Toxic “forever chemicals” remain laxly regulated.

How is the air where you live?

The future of the Good Neighbor Plan hangs in the balance, with implications for public health and economic prosperity nationwide.

Falls short on climate; restores critical funding for water infrastructure

Letter comes on eve of the 14th anniversary of the BP Deepwater Horizon spill

The future of the Good Neighbor Plan is uncertain, with implications for public health and economic prosperity

El futuro del Plan del Buen Vecino es incierto, con implicaciones para la salud pública y la prosperidad económica

The updates will reduce more than 6,000 tons of the nation’s most harmful air pollution, including the carcinogens ethylene oxide and chloroprene

Legislation will focus on permitting reform, air quality enforcement, additional measures to cut harmful pollution in Colorado

Fossil fuel industry will be made more responsible for costs of decommissioning offshore drilling projects

Sam Sankar, Senior Vice President of Programs: “Polluting industries always challenge pollution regulations because it costs them money to protect our health. We’re hoping that a few members of the court’s right-wing supermajority will remember that they shouldn’t be second-guessing sound judgments about what’s best for our kids’ lungs.”

Search by county to see the level of smog pollution in the air. Smog can trigger asthma attacks and increase the risk of heart and lung diseases.

Major polluters could finally be held responsible for Southern California’s dirty air

The ‘Smoggy Skies Act’ would weaken the Clean Air Act, limit the use of science-based decision making, and put the profits of polluting industries over the right to clean air