Library Search

Meet some of the lawyers behind our cases, and learn how they’re defending our land, air, and water against the Trump administration’s unprecedented threats.

BP must address serious flaws in proposal for ultra-deepwater drilling project before it can move forward

Comment letter shared by President Whitney Gravelle of the Bay Mills Indian Community with Michigan’s Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) in considering permits for Enbridge’s Line 5 oil tunnel project.

What’s happening: The federal government has rejected an initial proposal by BP, the company behind the worst oil spill in U.S. history, to build a new, ultra-deepwater project in the Gulf of Mexico. The decision came after Members of Congress sent a letter to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, urging the agency not to…

Members have serious concerns about BP’s readiness to safely operate “Kaskida” project

Members of Congress urge the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to reject BP’s proposed Kaskida project.

The case could determine the future of California’s strongest-in-the-nation buffer zones between drilling sites and homes, schools, businesses

El plan podría generar más de 10 mil millones de toneladas adicionales de carbono en la atmósfera

Plan could lead to 10+ billion tons of additional carbon in Earth’s atmosphere

While Trump wreaks havoc, California can resist the big chill on zero-emissions.

EPA has no valid reason to issue a rule without soliciting public comment first

Aggressive new drilling proposed in northern Alaska poses grave risks to the planet — and to a vast and rare Arctic ecosystem.

The Trump administration’s energy and environmental policies are accelerating climate change — and a warming planet means more extreme weather.

BP’s proposed Kaskida project could become a sequel to Deepwater Horizon.

BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill was the most destructive in U.S. history. Now, the company wants to go into deeper and riskier waters in the Gulf.

We know where the Trump administration stands on clean air protections, but why are state legislators in California pushing a pro-pollution bill like SB 34 forward?

La EPA afirmó que los gases de efecto invernadero representan un riesgo para la salud pública. Sin embargo, la EPA de Trump quiere retractarse y derogar muchas de las normas que limitan la contaminación atmosférica.

The EPA’s proposal rejects mainstream science and misunderstands the law.