May 3, 2023
Toxic Coal Ash in Alabama: Addressing Coal Plants’ Hazardous Legacy
For decades, utilities disposed of coal ash – the hazardous substance left after burning coal for energy – by dumping it in unlined ponds and landfills. Alabama has 32 coal ash dumpsites.
Alabama is one of the nation’s top coal ash-generating states, ranking ninth in ash production in 2005.
After years of litigation and grassroots activism, on Apr. 25, 2024, the EPA issued a new rule that will force power plants to finally clean up their toxic coal ash. The EPA extended federal monitoring and cleanup requirements to hundreds of previously excluded older coal ash landfills and ponds that have been leaking toxic pollution into groundwater.
Note: Coal ash dumpsites referenced as “unregulated” throughout this page now are likely subject to federal regulation under the final rulemaking.
Coal ash contains hazardous pollutants including arsenic, boron, cobalt, chromium, lead, lithium, mercury, molybdenum, radium, selenium, and other heavy metals, which have been linked to cancer, heart and thyroid disease, reproductive failure, and neurological harm. In 2023, the EPA acknowledged that coal ash is even more dangerous than previously thought, with levels of arsenic and radiation that pose cancer risks.
Industry’s own data indicate that across the country 91% of coal plants are currently polluting groundwater above federal health standards with toxic pollutants.
Despite EPA’s 2015 Coal Ash Rule, which created the first-ever safeguards for coal ash disposal, many coal ash dumps remained unregulated due to sweeping exemptions for legacy coal ash ponds and inactive landfills. The exempted coal ash dumps are sited disproportionately in low-income communities and communities of color. The EPA extended clean up requirements to hundreds of old coal ash dumps across the country when it issued new regulations in the spring of 2024.
Coal ash remains one of our nation’s largest toxic industrial waste streams. U.S. coal plants continue to produce approximately 75 million tons every year.
In 2023, the EPA acknowledged widespread noncompliance with existing coal ash regulations and ramped up enforcement after designating coal ash a national enforcement priority.
Action Needed
The magnitude of harm from recklessly dumped toxic coal ash requires decisive action from federal and state regulators.
- Utilities must be required to comply with the law and immediately clean up their pollution.
- EPA and states must act quickly to ensure that utilities leave communities with sites that benefit rather than harm their health, environment, and economic status.
- EPA must take action to prohibit the use of coal ash as construction fill and make polluters clean up areas where ash was used as fill.
16 Regulated Coal Ash Disposal Sites in Alabama
Alabama utilities operate 16 federally regulated coal ash ponds and landfills at eight plants that contain more than 118 million cubic yards of toxic waste.
Coal ash has caused significant groundwater contamination at all of Alabama’s regulated dumpsites. In fact, five of the state’s eight power plants rank among the top 25% of the most contaminated coal ash sites.
Alabama utilities, however, have failed to initiate any plant-wide cleanups to restore water resources despite the legal requirement to do so.
In addition, Alabama Power is planning to close in place unlined coal ash impoundments with ash in contact with groundwater, which is prohibited by the federal rule and which would ensure continued contamination at those sites.
| Charles Lowman | Leroy | Power South Energy Coop | 3 unlined ponds | Arsenic (x14), Beryllium (x1), Boron (x6), Cobalt (x156), Lithium (x4), Molybdenum (x5), Sulfate (x2) |
| Colbert | Tuscumbia | Tennessee Valley Authority | 1 unlined pond | Arsenic (x4), Boron (x2), Cobalt (x4) |
| EC Gaston | Wilsonville | Alabama Power | 1 unlined pond, 1 lined pond | Arsenic (x2), Boron (x2), Cobalt (x1), Lithium (x14), Molybdenum (x54), Radium 226+228 (x3), Sulfate (x1) |
| James Miller | Quinton | Alabama Power | 1 unlined pond | Arsenic (x1), Boron (x2), Cobalt (x12), Lithium (x6), Molybdenum (x3), Sulfate (x3) |
| James Barry | Bucks | Alabama Power | 1 unlined pond, 1 lined pond | Arsenic (x7), Boron (x1), Cobalt (x5) |
| Plant Gadsden | Gadsden | Alabama Power | 1 unlined pond | Arsenic (x82), Cobalt (x9), Lithium (x2), Sulfate (x1) |
| Plant Greene | Demopolis | Alabama Power | 1 unlined pond | Arsenic (x40), Boron (x1), Cobalt (x12), Lithium (x16), Molybdenum (x3), Sulfate (x2) |
| William Gorgas | Parrish | Alabama Power | 2 unlined ponds, 3 landfills | Arsenic (x20), Boron (x7), Cobalt (x72), Lithium (x11), Molybdenum (x4), Sulfate (x6) |
All data on groundwater contamination from coal ash derived from the utilities’ publicly accessible CCR Compliance Data and Information websites, and exceedances were calculated by Environmental Integrity Project.
For more information on regulated coal ash sites in Alabama and throughout the U.S., see Mapping the Coal Ash Contamination.
16 Coal Ash Legacy Ponds and Inactive Landfills in Alabama
March 2024 Update: The table below underestimates the legacy units that may be regulated by EPA’s upcoming CCR Legacy Pond Rule. Additional legacy units at specific plants may be found in the national map, above.
In addition, Alabama hosts 16 inactive coal ash landfills and legacy ponds at three active and retired coal plants. The exact number remains unknown because utilities were not required to report these sites.
These dumps are almost certainly contaminating water and threatening health and the environment; however, monitoring data are not currently available for most unregulated sites.
As we anticipate EPA’s proposed rule on legacy ponds and unregulated landfills in May 2023, a concern remains that the agency will not address coal ash that was dumped off site or used as fill.
| Charles Lowman | Leroy | Power South Energy Coop | 0 | 1 | Yes – Industry data |
| Colbert | Tuscumbia | Tennessee Valley Authority | 0 | 2 | Yes – Industry data and EPA damage case |
| Widows Creek | Stevenson | Tennessee Valley Authority | 12 | 1 | Yes – EPA damage case |
These data were developed by using EPA datasets relied upon in their 2007 and 2014 CCR risk assessments (Human and Ecological Risk Assessment of Coal Combustion Residuals) and comparing those datasets to the universe of regulated units.
“EPA damage case” denotes a site where US EPA has found documented groundwater contamination from coal ash.
For More Information
Christine Santillana, Legislative Counsel, Earthjustice, csantillana@earthjustice.org
Lisa Evans, Senior Counsel, Earthjustice, levans@earthjustice.org.
More on Coal Ash in Alabama
- Coal Ash Dump in Alabama's Black Belt: Another Symbol of Racism's Staying Power (February 17, 2016)
- NBC & CPI Series Spotlight Crucial Need for EPA Action on Race Discrimination (August 5, 2015)
- A Toxic Inheritance (March 6, 2014)
- Defending Uniontown, AL from Toxic Coal Ash (March 10, 2014)
Coal Ash in States, Territories, Regions
Puerto Rico (En Español)
Earthjustice fights in the courts for a long-term solution to the toxic menace of coal ash. And we act on behalf of dozens of clients and over 100 coalition partners to defeat legislative attempts to subvert federally enforceable safeguards of coal ash.
Earthjustice’s Clean Energy Program uses the power of the law and the strength of partnership to accelerate the transition to 100% clean energy.